19 Comments
User's avatar
Kathleen Weber's avatar

Wings or flaps on figure skater take air to work. That is why designing a wing is called aerodynamics. No air on the moon. Not even birds will be able to fly, but they'll sure be good at hopping.

Also, I assume your moon ice skating involves ice. That much frozen water would be extremely expensive, and the ice would quickly sublimate (go directly from a solid to a gas).

BTW, I thought Alan Shepard hitting a golf ball a mile on the moon was a pretty impressive moon sports moment.

Expand full comment
Some Guy's avatar

Dome is pressurized. Apologies for not saying so explicitly.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Weber's avatar

OK!

Expand full comment
Anna Trombley's avatar

WoW. How your mind works!

Expand full comment
Some Guy's avatar

I’m a pretty weird guy, yeah

Expand full comment
Rebecca's avatar

Here for the comments

Expand full comment
Some Guy's avatar

Can’t believe I forgot to call out that it was pressurized

Expand full comment
TotallyHuman's avatar

They probably made the mistake because your first AI-generated image had a bunch of people wearing EVA suits inside the dome.

Expand full comment
Some Guy's avatar

I had a surprisingly hard time getting it to make the lady not be in the spacesuit. Rereading it I do seem curt here. Not my intent.

Expand full comment
Marqv's avatar

Hi

I would like to invite you to have a look at our latest, Carl Sagan-inspired, article, here it is - https://canfictionhelpusthrive.substack.com/p/from-sagan-to-the-jacksons-debate

Expand full comment
Rebecca's avatar

Dude, that interaction is gonna be my favorite thing of the day.

Expand full comment
Some Guy's avatar

I also used axion instead of axiom

Expand full comment
Rebecca's avatar

Oh yeh I thought this was an analogy for the nervous system and neurons

Expand full comment
Some Guy's avatar

Just autocorrect fucking me yet again

Expand full comment
David J Keown's avatar

So...43.3 sq ft per triangle * 25,000 triangles gives 1,082,500 sq ft, but your dome is only 192,000 sq ft?

Expand full comment
Some Guy's avatar

Argh. This is what I get for using gpt and not staring hard enough. I will amend.

Expand full comment
David J Keown's avatar

Also cost to moon vs cost-to-orbit multiplier should be closer to 20x.

Anyway, I think your overall idea is fun. I'm running a contract under NASA's InSpace manufacturing arm. We usually think about benefits for in-space manufacturing in terms of how to use microgravity to improve crystal growth or how to use a "wake-shield" to achieve ultra-high vacuum for molecular beam epitaxy. But finding an economically viable application is tough.

Maybe entertainment is more profitable.

Expand full comment
Keenan Weind's avatar

Another banger...

Expand full comment
RDM's avatar

NAILED IT!!! "I BELIEVE, BROTHER!":

Expand full comment