Voted for Space Catholic Future, but I'm really curious about Shadow Library and The Intelligence Speed Limit of the Universe. Hope you write those too eventually!
> It’s in those cases that I think the best thing we could possibly have is a system where two sides present an argument, a judge makes sure rules are followed, and random uninvolved people decide the outcome. The best way to live under a rule of law that most people can accept and understand is to randomly poll a group of those people about what the outcome of an event should be. The best way to arrive at truth is to make sure each “side” has an advocate and to fully incentivize them to bring forward relevant facts for those random people to consider.
Yeah, I do mostly agree with this part, and it's good that we get it right. I think the problem comes out of having the argument people also be the ones who make the details of the rules of the system, since I think that introduces a whole different stack of problems (that aren't necessary in order to have the good things about the system).
I will love any story you write
I will write to be worthy of that
Voted for Space Catholic Future, but I'm really curious about Shadow Library and The Intelligence Speed Limit of the Universe. Hope you write those too eventually!
All of it in time!
Regardless of the polls, you'll eventually write *all* of those stories, yeah? 😘
All in time!
Guy! I just looked at your github repo. I am a dev/manager and can help some I think. How best to contact each other? On GH I am dlwiii.
DM’ing you right now!
> It’s in those cases that I think the best thing we could possibly have is a system where two sides present an argument, a judge makes sure rules are followed, and random uninvolved people decide the outcome. The best way to live under a rule of law that most people can accept and understand is to randomly poll a group of those people about what the outcome of an event should be. The best way to arrive at truth is to make sure each “side” has an advocate and to fully incentivize them to bring forward relevant facts for those random people to consider.
Yeah, I do mostly agree with this part, and it's good that we get it right. I think the problem comes out of having the argument people also be the ones who make the details of the rules of the system, since I think that introduces a whole different stack of problems (that aren't necessary in order to have the good things about the system).
I agree and am open to fine tuning stuff. We can’t spend our whole life arguing.
I saw that caught a hint from the OG that it would be okay to post my thoughts about Trump's victory. Sorry if I misunderstood!
I voted for Kamala Harris. But she lost big. I thought about it hard for three days and I have come up with a shocking answer .
Do you realize that 12 million Biden voters stayed home in 2024?
I invite you to read "Vanished into thin air: Where did 12 million Democratic voters go?"
https://kathleenweber.substack.com/p/vanished-into-thin-air-where-did
I will check it out today! And feel free to talk away. I want to have a very light hand on moderation.