I think a reason why the argumentation sounds disingenuous and repetitive is it's not always being made in good faith, because the actual goal is something different, and having a censorship infrastructure, which can be deployed for political ends, is the point.
(And also there's an aspect of applying the same hammer to every nail to write a story when you're under a deadline.)
I also think there’s so much groupthink now people don’t stop, pull back, and just start thinking a problem through from one end to the other. It’s a lot of “look around” go pick up your bucket of “fuck you’s” and figure out which “fuck you” superficially appears to fit into the situation.
I know substack doesn’t think this is their problem to solve but for as long as people are people, we will need clear rules and transparent enforcement. Otherwise, you get things like people clamoring for censorship.
In what the late Saddam Hussein once dubbed “the great Satan,” roughly two-thirds of the United States enlisted military corps is white . . . The fat, bulbous U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin once confirmed in a 93-2 vote of the U.S. Senate, immediately embarked on a whirlwind media tour of duty, telling the pseudo-secular sycophants in the state-controlled tabloid press and state-controlled television talk show circuit about how the U.S. Army is full of bad racist white men.
Senior Defense Department leaders celebrating yet another Pride Month at the Pentagon sounding the alarm about the rising number of state laws they say target the LGBTQ+ community, warned the trend is hurting the feelings of the armed forces . . . “LGBTQ plus and other diverse communities are under attack, just because they are different. Hate for hate’s sake,” said Gil Cisneros, the Pentagon’s undersecretary for personnel and readiness, who also serves as DoD’s chief diversity and inclusion officer.
And now the U.S. Army is doing ads begging for more young white males? What happened?
Even with a full-on declaration of war from Congress, and even if Gavin Newsome could be cheated into the Oval Office by ZOG somehow, with Globohomo diversity brigades going door-to-door looking to impress American children into military service, they will be met with armed, well-trained opposition, the invasion at the Southern border is going full tilt, and the drugs are flowing in like never before.
Get ready for it . . . the fat old devil worshipping fags on Capitol Hill, on Wall Street, in Whitehall, and in Brussels are in no shape to fight a war themselves, and most Americans are armed to the teeth with their own guns . . . NATO hates heterosexual white men . . . they said so themselves . . .
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only strengthened the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals . . .
The transnational, transracial, transcultural ideals that these ideologies preach to us (beyond peoples, races, cultures) and are the daily diet in our schools, in our media, in our pop culture, in our universities and on our streets, have reduced our biosymbolic identity and ethnic pride to their minimal expression.
Judaism, Christianity and Islam are death cults that originated in the Middle East and are completely alien to Europe and its peoples.
Sometimes one wonders why the European left gets along so well with Muslims. Why does an often openly anti-religious movement side with a fierce religiosity that seems to oppose almost everything the left always claims to stand for? Part of the explanation lies in the fact that Islam and Marxism share a common ideological root: Judaism.
Don Rumsfeld was right to say, "Europe has shifted on its axis," the wrong side has won World War II, and it is becoming clearer by the day . . .
What has NATO done to defend Europe?
Absolutely nothing.
My enemies are not in Moscow, Damascus, Tehran, Riyadh or some ethereal Teutonic bogeyman, but in Washington, Brussels and Tel Aviv.
Okay dude if you can’t give a cogent response where what I say to you changes what you say back to me I’m going to block you. You seem kinda nuts I’m happy to argue as time allows as long as you can state an argument.
Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) have every right to say what they like about Israel and the genocide of Palestinians as elected members of the US House of Representatives; they never took an oath to serve Israel . . . I voted for Ron Desantis (R-FL) to be governor of Florida, not ambassador to Israel.
The recently ousted Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Congressman Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who took at least a dozen votes to get elected speaker, traveled to Israel immediately upon his election, declaring to the Israeli Knesset that the USA is steadfastly committed to supporting Ukraine in their war against Russia . . . Was he running for speaker of the Israeli Knesset too?
Following his ouster . . . McCarthy (R-CA) traveled abroad again, this time to England, and expressed his open contempt for the white Republicans who make up the majority of the GOP and praised Democrats for their diversity during a debate at Oxford in the wake of his ouster as House Speaker . . . Is he now running for the Prime Minister of the U.K.?
Nevertheless, he is free to go on media tours bashing white people and lobbying for Israel, because he has now resigned from the US House of Representatives . . . I can only conclude that the collective RINO butthurt over former Speaker McCarthy is all about the Israelis who have hijacked the American deep state war machine.
It has become so painfully obvious, especially where you have someone like Nikki Haley wagging her finger and shouting down Vivek Ramaswamy in a presidential debate on live national television when the questions of this Ukrainian war against Russia and any mention of Israel are concerned, that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Committee.
It made me think of the gun control debate. It just goes round and round and everybody acts like there are no other options but do nothing or pass more laws.
It seems to me there is a problem being created where one never previously existed. Why should *anyone* or any group of people have the power to decide what does and doesn't belong on Substack? There is a TOS for a reason. You break it, then you're off the platform. Yes, Nazis are problematic. You know what is far more problematic? People who think they have the right or obligation to decide what I get to read.
Contrary to what this article posits, I am *extremely* concerned about deleting "Nazi-friendly" substacks. Why? Because someone needs to be the arbiter of what constitutes "Nazi-friendly", but much more importantly, people should have the freedom to post what they want on substack (unless they directly threaten a specific person with actual violence). This includes "Nazi-friendly" content. Its the price of free speech, and one we should all be willing to pay. That's the whole philosophy behind substack! You don't like the fact that Nazi friendly content is on substack? Then leave. No one is forcing you to stay. I am surprised that there has been such a kerfuffle over something so very simple, although I've noticed that it is the older generation that is so concerned about this empty threat of Nazis invading substack. Thankfully, the younger set realizes that a fight against some nebulous boogeyman is a waste of time and effort.
Not really sure what you think I’m advocating for here in particular so I don’t know how to respond. Was your reading that I think people should just be memory holed on arbitrary whim?
I guess what I am trying to say is we already have laws against threatening violence. If someone posts a specific and credible violent threat on substack, then the authorities can become involved as needed. Outside of a situation like this, why would we need to add any mechanism that allows someone on substack to interfere with what's posted?
In real life if you don’t want to hear what someone has to say you don’t go around them. Physical space provides a mediation mechanism.
In digital life if something or someone is exciting it gets eyeballs, good or bad. It’s specifically that amplification piece I’m taking to here. Just because someone wants to post wild shit and get eyeballs doesn’t mean they should get your attention if you in advance know you don’t want to see that kind of a thing. All I’m saying is give people that ability.
What is your solution exactly? As it stands, if someone posts something egregiously offensive, then that particular community will delete the post and block the user. If something is subjectively offensive, or just the type of thing you don't want to see, you personally have the option of blocking the user.
I am not sure if anything further is required in terms of moderation. If we used some kind of voting or due process system, that runs the risk of someone being punished and kicked off the island. Someone whose posts, I personally never found offensive in the first place. I am not willing to trade a little liberty for a little security.
I think a reason why the argumentation sounds disingenuous and repetitive is it's not always being made in good faith, because the actual goal is something different, and having a censorship infrastructure, which can be deployed for political ends, is the point.
(And also there's an aspect of applying the same hammer to every nail to write a story when you're under a deadline.)
I also think there’s so much groupthink now people don’t stop, pull back, and just start thinking a problem through from one end to the other. It’s a lot of “look around” go pick up your bucket of “fuck you’s” and figure out which “fuck you” superficially appears to fit into the situation.
I know substack doesn’t think this is their problem to solve but for as long as people are people, we will need clear rules and transparent enforcement. Otherwise, you get things like people clamoring for censorship.
In what the late Saddam Hussein once dubbed “the great Satan,” roughly two-thirds of the United States enlisted military corps is white . . . The fat, bulbous U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin once confirmed in a 93-2 vote of the U.S. Senate, immediately embarked on a whirlwind media tour of duty, telling the pseudo-secular sycophants in the state-controlled tabloid press and state-controlled television talk show circuit about how the U.S. Army is full of bad racist white men.
Senior Defense Department leaders celebrating yet another Pride Month at the Pentagon sounding the alarm about the rising number of state laws they say target the LGBTQ+ community, warned the trend is hurting the feelings of the armed forces . . . “LGBTQ plus and other diverse communities are under attack, just because they are different. Hate for hate’s sake,” said Gil Cisneros, the Pentagon’s undersecretary for personnel and readiness, who also serves as DoD’s chief diversity and inclusion officer.
And now the U.S. Army is doing ads begging for more young white males? What happened?
Even with a full-on declaration of war from Congress, and even if Gavin Newsome could be cheated into the Oval Office by ZOG somehow, with Globohomo diversity brigades going door-to-door looking to impress American children into military service, they will be met with armed, well-trained opposition, the invasion at the Southern border is going full tilt, and the drugs are flowing in like never before.
Get ready for it . . . the fat old devil worshipping fags on Capitol Hill, on Wall Street, in Whitehall, and in Brussels are in no shape to fight a war themselves, and most Americans are armed to the teeth with their own guns . . . NATO hates heterosexual white men . . . they said so themselves . . .
https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/138320669/nato-an-anti-white-and-anti-family-institution
What does this have to do with what I wrote?
Jewish messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only strengthened the old Jewish narrative. These are the same ideals . . .
The transnational, transracial, transcultural ideals that these ideologies preach to us (beyond peoples, races, cultures) and are the daily diet in our schools, in our media, in our pop culture, in our universities and on our streets, have reduced our biosymbolic identity and ethnic pride to their minimal expression.
Judaism, Christianity and Islam are death cults that originated in the Middle East and are completely alien to Europe and its peoples.
Sometimes one wonders why the European left gets along so well with Muslims. Why does an often openly anti-religious movement side with a fierce religiosity that seems to oppose almost everything the left always claims to stand for? Part of the explanation lies in the fact that Islam and Marxism share a common ideological root: Judaism.
Don Rumsfeld was right to say, "Europe has shifted on its axis," the wrong side has won World War II, and it is becoming clearer by the day . . .
What has NATO done to defend Europe?
Absolutely nothing.
My enemies are not in Moscow, Damascus, Tehran, Riyadh or some ethereal Teutonic bogeyman, but in Washington, Brussels and Tel Aviv.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
Okay dude if you can’t give a cogent response where what I say to you changes what you say back to me I’m going to block you. You seem kinda nuts I’m happy to argue as time allows as long as you can state an argument.
Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) have every right to say what they like about Israel and the genocide of Palestinians as elected members of the US House of Representatives; they never took an oath to serve Israel . . . I voted for Ron Desantis (R-FL) to be governor of Florida, not ambassador to Israel.
The recently ousted Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Congressman Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who took at least a dozen votes to get elected speaker, traveled to Israel immediately upon his election, declaring to the Israeli Knesset that the USA is steadfastly committed to supporting Ukraine in their war against Russia . . . Was he running for speaker of the Israeli Knesset too?
Following his ouster . . . McCarthy (R-CA) traveled abroad again, this time to England, and expressed his open contempt for the white Republicans who make up the majority of the GOP and praised Democrats for their diversity during a debate at Oxford in the wake of his ouster as House Speaker . . . Is he now running for the Prime Minister of the U.K.?
Nevertheless, he is free to go on media tours bashing white people and lobbying for Israel, because he has now resigned from the US House of Representatives . . . I can only conclude that the collective RINO butthurt over former Speaker McCarthy is all about the Israelis who have hijacked the American deep state war machine.
It has become so painfully obvious, especially where you have someone like Nikki Haley wagging her finger and shouting down Vivek Ramaswamy in a presidential debate on live national television when the questions of this Ukrainian war against Russia and any mention of Israel are concerned, that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Committee.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/138320669/fight-your-own-wars-you-kikesucking-zionist-ass-whores
I loved this- thank you!
It made me think of the gun control debate. It just goes round and round and everybody acts like there are no other options but do nothing or pass more laws.
I hate the feeling that we are all just in an endless play where no facts can be known and nothing can be done.
Well thought out and well articulated. Now I will have to keep going "Oh. Huh". See what you have done?! Many thanks.
I hereby name you a doctor of L, M, N, O and P as well. Arise, Knight, and ride forth to bring freedom to my kingdom.
I think you have ‘coined’ the latest disorder. I wonder when a pharmaceutical company will make a drug for it: ‘Attention Epilepsy.’
We all have it
It seems to me there is a problem being created where one never previously existed. Why should *anyone* or any group of people have the power to decide what does and doesn't belong on Substack? There is a TOS for a reason. You break it, then you're off the platform. Yes, Nazis are problematic. You know what is far more problematic? People who think they have the right or obligation to decide what I get to read.
Contrary to what this article posits, I am *extremely* concerned about deleting "Nazi-friendly" substacks. Why? Because someone needs to be the arbiter of what constitutes "Nazi-friendly", but much more importantly, people should have the freedom to post what they want on substack (unless they directly threaten a specific person with actual violence). This includes "Nazi-friendly" content. Its the price of free speech, and one we should all be willing to pay. That's the whole philosophy behind substack! You don't like the fact that Nazi friendly content is on substack? Then leave. No one is forcing you to stay. I am surprised that there has been such a kerfuffle over something so very simple, although I've noticed that it is the older generation that is so concerned about this empty threat of Nazis invading substack. Thankfully, the younger set realizes that a fight against some nebulous boogeyman is a waste of time and effort.
Not really sure what you think I’m advocating for here in particular so I don’t know how to respond. Was your reading that I think people should just be memory holed on arbitrary whim?
I guess what I am trying to say is we already have laws against threatening violence. If someone posts a specific and credible violent threat on substack, then the authorities can become involved as needed. Outside of a situation like this, why would we need to add any mechanism that allows someone on substack to interfere with what's posted?
In real life if you don’t want to hear what someone has to say you don’t go around them. Physical space provides a mediation mechanism.
In digital life if something or someone is exciting it gets eyeballs, good or bad. It’s specifically that amplification piece I’m taking to here. Just because someone wants to post wild shit and get eyeballs doesn’t mean they should get your attention if you in advance know you don’t want to see that kind of a thing. All I’m saying is give people that ability.
What is your solution exactly? As it stands, if someone posts something egregiously offensive, then that particular community will delete the post and block the user. If something is subjectively offensive, or just the type of thing you don't want to see, you personally have the option of blocking the user.
I am not sure if anything further is required in terms of moderation. If we used some kind of voting or due process system, that runs the risk of someone being punished and kicked off the island. Someone whose posts, I personally never found offensive in the first place. I am not willing to trade a little liberty for a little security.
Long and minds spergy but here it is:
https://extelligence.substack.com/p/the-basic-things-that-make-civilization
Basically, scale up the stuff you do as an individual across a group of people you trust and do things to make sure that trust remains earned.